Health Tips
Q: Will I lose body fat more efficiently by performing my aerobic workouts at a low, rather than a high, intensity?
A: Many aerobic exercise programs and videos feature low-intensity workouts which purport to maximize fat burning. The argument behind such an alleged theory is that low-intensity aerobic training will allow your body to use more fat as an energy source, thereby accelerating the loss of body fat. While it is true that a higher proportion of calories burned during low-intensity exercise come from fat (about 60 percent as opposed to approximately 35 percent from high-intensity programs), high-intensity exercise still burns more calories from fat in the final analysis.
For example, if you perform 30 minutes of low-intensity aerobic exercise (i.e., at a level of 50 percent of maximal exercise capacity), you'll burn approximately 200 calories - about 120 of those come from fat (i.e., 60 percent). However, exercising for the same amount of time at a high intensity (i.e., 75 percent of your maximal exercise capacity) will burn approximately 400 calories. Using a 35 percent fat utilization yardstick, 140 of the calories you've burned will have come from stored fat.
Although the more vigorous exercise burns both more total and more fat calories, the less intense form of exercise has its benefits as well. For example, because many overweight people tend to find that lower-intensity exercise is more comfortable, they may, therefore, be willing to engage in such workouts.
The point to remember is that low-intensity workouts do, in fact, promote weight and fat loss. You just have to do them for a longer period of time.
Low-intensity aerobic exercise, however, is not a better or more effective way to lose weight than more intense physical activity - the idea of a "fat-burning zone" is simply a myth.
Keep in mind that you lose weight and body fat when you expend more calories than you consume, not because you burn fat (or anything else) when you exercise.
Source: Bryant, Cedric X. 101 Frequently Asked Questions about "Health & Fitness" and "Nutrition & Weight Control". Sagamore Publishing, 1999.
FitBits May 15, 2008
Exercise ETCÂ’s Review of Exercise Related Research
Compiled by Chris Marino, MS, CSCS
Director of Education, Exercise ETC
Increased Muscularity Results in Stronger Bones
Hip fractures present one of the greatest concerns for people with Osteoporosis. The latest statistics show that 25% of women over 50 who suffer a hip fracture die within 1 year. Exercise has long been shown to help reduce the risk of hip fractures by increasing bone mineral density while improving core strength and balance.
A recent study suggests that women might also want to pack on the muscle. Researchers at the University of Iowa reported that lower-body muscle mass was a better predictor of hipbone mineral density than either strength or physical activity level.
Fifteen hundred men and women over age 50 were evaluated for quadriceps strength and lower-body muscle mass. Although hip BMD and quadricep strength were related, the relationship was not consistent. The relationship between lower-body muscle mass and Hip BMD was maintained even after age, race, and sex were accounted for.
A simple method for identifying individuals at increased risk for a hip fracture can help reduce the mortality associated with Osteoporosis. This study provides insight into such a method. In addition, exercise professionals should rethink program design for older clients to include improvements in both lower body muscle mass and strength for osteoporosis patients.
Segal, N.A. et al (2008) Muscle Mass Is More Strongly Related to Hip Bone Mineral Density Than Is Quadriceps Strength or Lower Activity Level in Adults Over Age 50 Year. Journal of Clinical Densitomitry.
Can Walnuts Help to Prevent Prostate Cancer & Heart Disease?
Walnuts are not only one of the best sources of plant protein, but are also an excellent source of Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Vitamin E, a fat-soluble antioxidant. Considerable research has shown the value of Omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants in the prevention of many diseases. Now, researchers have found that walnuts my reduce the risk of prostate cancer and improve vascular health.
Researchers supplemented the diets of 21 older men with walnuts for 8-weeks. Levels of Vitamin E and prostate specific androgens (PSAs) were measured before and after.
Subjects consumed their typical diet with or without a 75g/day walnut supplement. Five participants completed a timed study to determine acute changes in triglyceride levels in the blood. Measurements were taken at baseline and 1, 2, 4 and 8 hours after eating 75g of walnuts.
The results showed a significant decrease in triglycerides, which may reduce the risk of heart disease and a trend towards a decrease in PSA levels, which may reduce the risk of prostate cancer.
This research also supports previous findings that walnuts may help reduce inflammation, decrease risk of certain types of cancer and reduce risk or delay the onset of AlzheimerÂ’s disease.
Spaccarotella, K.J. et al (2008) The effect of walnut intake on factors related to prostate and vascular health in older men. Nutrition Journal.
The Financial Burden of Obesity in the Elderly
One of the greatest challenges for America in the 21st Century will be funding healthcare for older adults who rely on Medicare and Medicaid. In fact, economists predict that at the current rate Medicare/Medicaid will be bankrupt by 2030.
By 2010 approximately 70% of the American population, many of whom will be over 65, will be overweight or obese. It is rarely disputed that the obesity epidemic has contributed to the instability of the American health care system.
A recent study examined the contribution of overweight and obesity to the current financial strain experienced by the US Healthcare System. Researchers at the University of Florida used body weight data to compare lifetime health care expenditures for older Americans over the age of 65.
Compared to normal weight men, men who were overweight or obese at age 65 up to 13% more on health care than normal weight men. Overweight or obese women had expenditures that were 11 to 17% higher than normal weight comparisons.
This research supports the initiative to reduce health care costs by making concerted behavioral such as eating a little less and exercising a little more.
Yang, Z., and Hall, A.G. (2008) The Financial Burden of Overweight and Obesity among Elderly Americans: The Dynamics of Weight, Longevity, and Health Care Cost. Health Services Research. 43(3):849-68.
Maximal Strength Training Improves Running Economy
Researchers from Norway have strengthened the ties between maximal strength training and running economy. Running economy is one of three components essential to performing well, the other two being maximal oxygen consumption and lactate threshold.
Well-trained male and female runners either participated in strength training 3 times per week for 8-weeks or served as controls. The strength training group performed 4 sets of 4 repetition maximum (RM) half-squats. Both groups completed their normal endurance training routines.
The strength training group increased their 1RM in the half-squat by 33.2%. Their rate of force development increased by 26%, their running economy improved by 5%, and their time to exhaustion at maximal aerobic speed improved by 21.3%. VO2max and bodyweight remained unchanged.
Because endurance activities are mostly dependent on aerobic metabolism it would seem to make sense to think that performance would be determined by training the aerobic energy systems. However, the ability to produce joint actions at submaximal intensities, as in running, is related to maximal strength. This study has supported the need for strength training in the runner and has also found that running does not interfere with the ability to gain strength.
Storen, O. et al (2008) Maximal Strength Training Improves Running Economy in Distance Runners. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. May 2. (ePub ahead of print)
Correspondence Course Sale:
Your Choice: $49.00 each
Regular $79 - $89 each
Each program includes a soft-cover textbook, separate testing booklet and free, instant grading.
Choose from:
Power Eating: Credits: 0.5 ACE; 5.0 AAAI-ISMA; 5.0 ACSM; 3.0 AEA; 5.0 AFPA; 5.0 AMFPT; 8.0 BOC; 0.6 CSCS; 5.0 IFPA; 5.0 ISSA; 8.0 NATA; 4.0 NCSF; 5.0 NDEITA; 5.0 NETA; 5.0 NFPT; 0.6 NSCA-CPT; 5.0 NSPA; 5.0 SCW-EDU; 5.0 SFA; 5.0 WITS.
Athletic Abs: Credits: 0.9 ACE; 9.0 AAAI-ISMA; 9.0 ACSM; 4.0 AEA; 9.0 AFPA; 9.0 AMFPT; 0.6 CSCS; 6.0 IFPA; 9.0 ISSA; 4.0 NCSF; 9.0 NDEITA; 2.0 NETA; 4.0 NFPT; 0.6 NSCA-CPT; 9.0 NSPA; 9.0 SCW-EDU; 9.0 SFA; 9.0 WITS.
Sculpting Her Body Perfect: Credits: 0.6 ACE; 6.0 AAAI-ISMA; 6.0 ACSM; 6.0 AEA; 6.0 AFPA; 6.0 AMFPT; 0.6 CSCS; 6.0 IFPA; 6.0 ISSA; 3.0 NCSF; 6.0 NDEITA; 6.0 NETA; 6.0 NFPT; 0.6 NSCA-CPT; 6.0 NSPA; 6.0 SCW-EDU; 6.0 SFA; 6.0 WITS.
Strength Training Anatomy: Credits: 1.0 ACE; 10.0 AAAI-ISMA; 10.0 ACSM; 5.0 AEA; 10.0 AFPA; 10.0 AMFPT; 6.5 BOC; 0.5 CSCS; 10.0 IFPA; 10.0 ISSA; 6.5 NATA; 3.5 NCSF; 10.0 NDEITA; 10.0 NETA; 10.0 NFPT; 0.5 NSCA-CPT; 10.0 NSPA; 10.0 SCW-EDU; 10.0 SFA; 10.0 WITS.
For course descriptions or to order, please visit: http://www.exerciseetc.com/specials.html
or call 1-800-244-1344.
Sale prices in effect until Monday, May 19, 2008. Please allow 10-14 days for delivery.